Cheap Marketing Shop

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 28 July 2006

Open innovation and alliances

Posted on 06:36 by Unknown
It goes without saying that alliances are crucial to an open innovation strategy. By tapping into other organizations for some part of your product, you require structures, agreements and management of those other organizations. Here is a way of looking at the different types of alliances that fuel open innovation:

Dominant partner (Apple iPod, P&G) - in this type of scenario the main partner controls the direction and assumes much of the risk of the venture. Partners do work for hire, or invest in development of their component or process, but don't contribute much to the overall product investment. Accordingly, they have limited or no influence on how the product is marketed, packaged, distributed or sold.

Confederation (Boeing) - in this scenario, the main partner (sometimes called the integration contractor) leverages partners who bring distinctive capabilities to the partnership. These subcontractors often make an ongoing contribution to the design of the product and take on development and investment risk. Their reward is correspondingly greater, for example gaining exclusivity for their component in the product.

Revenue share (ITunes) - here, the contribution of the partners is substantial, including exclusive intellectual property, brand image, etc., and they command a share of the revenue rather than a direct price per unit delivered.

Peer alliance (Sony Ericsson) - the most intertwined relationship is a joint venture. Here there is no dominant partner per se, but a group of partners who contribute capital, management and intellectual property. The peer nature of these relationships can make them the most fractious (see Sony BMG).

Each type of alliance creates its own challenges and issues. So, it needs its own type of management and governance. And, in spite of the legal documents and governance procedures that are created, a requirement to make these alliances work is the effort teams put in to communicate clearly, understand each other, and solve problems.

innovation, product development, alliances
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Ann knows segmentation
    Friday's "Boss Talk" feature in the Journal presented an interview with Ann Taylor CEO Kay Krill . Most fascinating to me abou...
  • Cherish those distant connections
    The new book " Firing Back: How Great Leaders Rebound After Career Disasters ," excerpted in the January Harvard Business Review, ...
  • Top 5 HBR Breakthrough Ideas
    Harvard Business Review's annual look at hot new ideas is something to cherish, but who has time to digest all twenty ideas? So, here a...
  • Innovation: doing it all yourself is so twentieth century
    My most recent work experience involved a smaller company that, with limited resources, relied significantly on partners for technology inno...
  • It's the handsets, baby
    One message at the MVNO Strategies & Markets Conference this week is that the handset has become perhaps the most important aspect of a...
  • Is Microsoft innovative?
    In case you missed it, there's a nice article in yesterday's Wall Street Journal featuring a dialogue between Robert Scoble and Da...
  • Cingular an "unpopular distribution partner"...NOT
    In his wide-ranging attack on Steve Jobs in today's WSJ Op-Ed article (" iGenius " - $$), Michael Malone hits Cingular with an...
  • The sneaky price increase - should you use it for business services?
    Harvard Business School's Working Knowledge site has just republished a fascinating piece from 2004 in which HBS marketing professor Jo...
  • Satellite phones make a comeback in "Miami Vice"
    OK, OK, I just can't let "Miami Vice" go. But of the movies I've seen in recent years, it stands alone in its celebration ...
  • Yahoo-AT&T: an alliance under pressure
    Nothing cures end of the week writer's block better than a front page Wall Street Journal article on one of my favorite subjects: allia...

Categories

  • adoption
  • alliances
  • awards
  • blogging
  • blogs
  • branding
  • change management
  • communications
  • Harvard Business Review
  • innovation
  • leadership
  • lists
  • management
  • marketing
  • mobile
  • mvno
  • narrative
  • negotiation
  • New York Times
  • obituaries
  • open innovation
  • PDMA
  • presentation
  • private label
  • product development
  • promotion
  • psychology
  • reading list
  • retail
  • sales
  • spoken blogging
  • spoken post
  • sponsorship
  • sports
  • storytelling
  • strategy
  • technology
  • telecommunications
  • Wall Street Journal
  • what-in-hell-is
  • wireless

Blog Archive

  • ►  2007 (69)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (30)
    • ►  January (28)
  • ▼  2006 (157)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (36)
    • ►  October (26)
    • ►  September (27)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ▼  July (17)
      • Open innovation and alliances
      • Awaiting user innovation in business software markets
      • Corporate blogging part 2
      • What in hell is the fuzzy front end?
      • When good deals go bad
      • Corporate blogging - what is it good for?
      • Open innovation
      • Computer models outperform humans in decision-maki...
      • How much is that software worth, anyhow?
      • Finally, a well-reasoned, and reasonable, net neut...
      • Farewell, Professor Levitt
      • How do you market & sell a product that isn't a pr...
      • GE uses "net promoter score" to measure customer s...
      • Search-engine advertising - benefits and drawbacks
      • To close, a purchaser must be ready, willing and able
      • Ending the war between sales and marketing
      • It's like Christmas in July
    • ►  June (13)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile