Cheap Marketing Shop

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 17 July 2006

How much is that software worth, anyhow?

Posted on 12:22 by Unknown
Pricing business software licenses is one of the gnarliest pricing jobs around. My pricing bible is "The Strategy and Tactics of Pricing" by Tom Nagle. I took a class with him at Boston University around 1990 while I was studying for my MBA, and this book has been on my bookshelf every since.

Nagle says that you should take into account incremental & avoidable costs, economic value of the product, and competition when pricing a product. A good price balances each of these factors to maximize profit.

Enterprise software poses some challenges on this front. First, incremental and avoidable costs are very small (how much does a CD cost? a download?), which creates a dimensioning problem (should we price it per processor? per seat? per transaction?). Economic value is difficult to calculate (especially with complex software programs that span many departments), and prospective customers are often reluctant to let you really see the value they'd receive, for fear that they'd compromise their negotiating position. And good pricing information on competitors is rare, since deals are often priced on a one-off basis--never mind understanding their strengths and weaknesses enough to create the proper premium or discount.

Some of these problems, I think, have helped the Software as a Service (SAAS) industry. Since SAAS bundles in application support and hosting, it has a much clearer incremental cost picture, which helps justify a certain price level. Also, SAAS applications have been smaller in scope, yielding an easier economic value assessment for both suppliers and customers. And competitive pricing information is available, given the internet-based selling models of the SAAS providers.

There are certainly lots of reasons for the recent rise of SAAS, but I think pricing transparency is one of them.

marketing, pricing, strategy
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Ann knows segmentation
    Friday's "Boss Talk" feature in the Journal presented an interview with Ann Taylor CEO Kay Krill . Most fascinating to me abou...
  • Cherish those distant connections
    The new book " Firing Back: How Great Leaders Rebound After Career Disasters ," excerpted in the January Harvard Business Review, ...
  • Top 5 HBR Breakthrough Ideas
    Harvard Business Review's annual look at hot new ideas is something to cherish, but who has time to digest all twenty ideas? So, here a...
  • Innovation: doing it all yourself is so twentieth century
    My most recent work experience involved a smaller company that, with limited resources, relied significantly on partners for technology inno...
  • It's the handsets, baby
    One message at the MVNO Strategies & Markets Conference this week is that the handset has become perhaps the most important aspect of a...
  • Is Microsoft innovative?
    In case you missed it, there's a nice article in yesterday's Wall Street Journal featuring a dialogue between Robert Scoble and Da...
  • Cingular an "unpopular distribution partner"...NOT
    In his wide-ranging attack on Steve Jobs in today's WSJ Op-Ed article (" iGenius " - $$), Michael Malone hits Cingular with an...
  • The sneaky price increase - should you use it for business services?
    Harvard Business School's Working Knowledge site has just republished a fascinating piece from 2004 in which HBS marketing professor Jo...
  • Satellite phones make a comeback in "Miami Vice"
    OK, OK, I just can't let "Miami Vice" go. But of the movies I've seen in recent years, it stands alone in its celebration ...
  • Yahoo-AT&T: an alliance under pressure
    Nothing cures end of the week writer's block better than a front page Wall Street Journal article on one of my favorite subjects: allia...

Categories

  • adoption
  • alliances
  • awards
  • blogging
  • blogs
  • branding
  • change management
  • communications
  • Harvard Business Review
  • innovation
  • leadership
  • lists
  • management
  • marketing
  • mobile
  • mvno
  • narrative
  • negotiation
  • New York Times
  • obituaries
  • open innovation
  • PDMA
  • presentation
  • private label
  • product development
  • promotion
  • psychology
  • reading list
  • retail
  • sales
  • spoken blogging
  • spoken post
  • sponsorship
  • sports
  • storytelling
  • strategy
  • technology
  • telecommunications
  • Wall Street Journal
  • what-in-hell-is
  • wireless

Blog Archive

  • ►  2007 (69)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (30)
    • ►  January (28)
  • ▼  2006 (157)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (36)
    • ►  October (26)
    • ►  September (27)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ▼  July (17)
      • Open innovation and alliances
      • Awaiting user innovation in business software markets
      • Corporate blogging part 2
      • What in hell is the fuzzy front end?
      • When good deals go bad
      • Corporate blogging - what is it good for?
      • Open innovation
      • Computer models outperform humans in decision-maki...
      • How much is that software worth, anyhow?
      • Finally, a well-reasoned, and reasonable, net neut...
      • Farewell, Professor Levitt
      • How do you market & sell a product that isn't a pr...
      • GE uses "net promoter score" to measure customer s...
      • Search-engine advertising - benefits and drawbacks
      • To close, a purchaser must be ready, willing and able
      • Ending the war between sales and marketing
      • It's like Christmas in July
    • ►  June (13)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile