Cheap Marketing Shop

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 14 August 2006

News flash: you have to observe and listen to customers to create great products

Posted on 07:30 by Unknown
Yesterday's New York Times business section featured an article describing a hedge fund, a design firm and a software maker who found success by carefully watching and listening to customers, interpreting their input, and using that information to guide their investment decisions/design choices/marketing decisions.

It seemed very insightful when I read it. Yet, after reflecting on it overnight, it seems, well...

obvious?

So let's leave the article, which is well worth reading in its entirety, for the moment and discuss this: why is it so rare that companies observe customers closely and, even rarer, use that information to improve what they do?

Basically, it comes down to an issue of trust. Designers, executives, etc., trust their judgment more than they trust their customers'. Psychologist Daniel Gilbert, in his New York Times essays, has touched on this more than once. People overvalue their own opinions and undervalue those of others (especially those who lack comparable expertise).

The QuickBase example referenced in the Times article is interesting. The product, a software-as-a-service offering, was created for individuals and small businesses. After rolling it out, Quicken found that the target customer base was not interested in the product. Instead, small workgroups at midsize and large corporations were using it. (A neat thing about SaaS, from a marketer's perspective, is that who's using a product, and which features they're using, is easily tracked.)

Here would be the typical marketing response to that information. "Something's wrong. Let's work HARDER to convince the target market to buy the product. Let's add some more features and perhaps they'll grow to love it." Rather, Quicken did something sensible but rare--they revised their marketing approach to target the customers who found value in the product.

The smartest thing the marketers did was to rethink their views when faced with contrary evidence. Perhaps we can all enhance this skill. It's called humility.

marketing, innovation, strategy
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Ann knows segmentation
    Friday's "Boss Talk" feature in the Journal presented an interview with Ann Taylor CEO Kay Krill . Most fascinating to me abou...
  • Cherish those distant connections
    The new book " Firing Back: How Great Leaders Rebound After Career Disasters ," excerpted in the January Harvard Business Review, ...
  • Top 5 HBR Breakthrough Ideas
    Harvard Business Review's annual look at hot new ideas is something to cherish, but who has time to digest all twenty ideas? So, here a...
  • Innovation: doing it all yourself is so twentieth century
    My most recent work experience involved a smaller company that, with limited resources, relied significantly on partners for technology inno...
  • It's the handsets, baby
    One message at the MVNO Strategies & Markets Conference this week is that the handset has become perhaps the most important aspect of a...
  • Is Microsoft innovative?
    In case you missed it, there's a nice article in yesterday's Wall Street Journal featuring a dialogue between Robert Scoble and Da...
  • Cingular an "unpopular distribution partner"...NOT
    In his wide-ranging attack on Steve Jobs in today's WSJ Op-Ed article (" iGenius " - $$), Michael Malone hits Cingular with an...
  • The sneaky price increase - should you use it for business services?
    Harvard Business School's Working Knowledge site has just republished a fascinating piece from 2004 in which HBS marketing professor Jo...
  • Satellite phones make a comeback in "Miami Vice"
    OK, OK, I just can't let "Miami Vice" go. But of the movies I've seen in recent years, it stands alone in its celebration ...
  • Yahoo-AT&T: an alliance under pressure
    Nothing cures end of the week writer's block better than a front page Wall Street Journal article on one of my favorite subjects: allia...

Categories

  • adoption
  • alliances
  • awards
  • blogging
  • blogs
  • branding
  • change management
  • communications
  • Harvard Business Review
  • innovation
  • leadership
  • lists
  • management
  • marketing
  • mobile
  • mvno
  • narrative
  • negotiation
  • New York Times
  • obituaries
  • open innovation
  • PDMA
  • presentation
  • private label
  • product development
  • promotion
  • psychology
  • reading list
  • retail
  • sales
  • spoken blogging
  • spoken post
  • sponsorship
  • sports
  • storytelling
  • strategy
  • technology
  • telecommunications
  • Wall Street Journal
  • what-in-hell-is
  • wireless

Blog Archive

  • ►  2007 (69)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (30)
    • ►  January (28)
  • ▼  2006 (157)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (36)
    • ►  October (26)
    • ►  September (27)
    • ▼  August (15)
      • Principles of new product marketing - business-to-...
      • What's in a product name?
      • Vacation interlude
      • Successful innovation takes PIEER
      • News flash: you have to observe and listen to cust...
      • The best approach to fighting air terrorism may be...
      • How will musicians get paid in the 21st century?
      • Is revenue sharing the way to improve 3G mobile ha...
      • IBM makes purchase to energize outsourcing offerings
      • Corporate blogging part 4 - blog review
      • Corporate blogging part 3 - blog review preview
      • Satellite phones make a comeback in "Miami Vice"
      • Involving sales during the fuzzy front end: priceless
      • Building business alliances - lessons from "Miami ...
      • The perils of profit sharing
    • ►  July (17)
    • ►  June (13)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile